KNAW Repository

The impact of material used for minirhizotron tubes for root research

Withington, J.M. and Elkin, A.D. and Bulaj, B. and Olesinski, J. and Tracy, K.N. and Bouma, T.J. and Oleksyn, J. and Anderson, L.J. and Modrzyski, J. and Reich, P.B. and Eissenstat, D.M. (2003) The impact of material used for minirhizotron tubes for root research. New Phytologist, 160, 533-544. ISSN 0028-646X.

[img]PDF - Published Version
Restricted to KNAW only

359Kb

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00903.x

Abstract

A wide variety of transparent materials are currently used for minirhizotron tubes. We tested the null hypothesis that minirhizotron composition does not influence root morphology and dynamics. Minirhizotron data were compared for glass, acrylic and butyrate tubes in apple (Malus domestica) and acrylic and butyrate tubes in a study with six forest tree species. Root phenology and morphology were generally similar among tubes. Apple root production was greatest against glass; these roots became pigmented later and lived longer than roots near acrylic or butyrate. Roots generally became pigmented faster next to butyrate than next to acrylic. Root survivorship was shorter near butyrate tubes in three of the four hardwood species; however, survivorship was shorter near acrylic tubes for the three conifer species. Comparison of minirhizotron standing crop d This study reveals that the transparent material used often has little effect on root production but can substantially influence root survivorship in some plants

Item Type:Article
Institutes:Nederlands Instituut voor Ecologie (NIOO)
ID Code:11439
Deposited On:24 Nov 2011 01:00
Last Modified:31 Mar 2014 10:47

Repository Staff Only: item control page