Broekhuis, H. and Klooster, W.G. (2010) Merge and Move as costly operations. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem, 8, 155-182. ISSN 1678-8931.
|PDF (Broekhuis, H. and Klooster, W.G. (2010) Merge and Move as costly operations. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem, 8, 155-182. ISSN 1678-8931. ) - Published Version |
Restricted to KNAW only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Official URL: http://www.revel.inf.br/
This article argues that, contrary to what is claimed by Chomsky (1995), the operation Merge (= external merge) is not inherently more economical than the operation Move (= internal merge), and that the former therefore does not necessarily block the application of the latter. This claim makes it possible to assume that the computational system has free access to the lexicon and thus to eliminate the notion of a numeration. Of course, we need some criterion to decide which derivations are in competition and we will therefore adopt Grimshaw’s (1997) claim that this is simply a matter of meaning. We will show not only that the notion of a numeration is superfluous but also that it actually gives rise to empirically wrong results.
|Deposited On:||28 Jun 2011 16:48|
|Last Modified:||05 Jul 2011 13:13|
Repository Staff Only: item control page